Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 10:58

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What are some tips for keeping a durag on for a longer period of time?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
See photos: Miguel Angel Jiménez wins the Principal Charity Classic - The Des Moines Register
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why does Islam give a bad vibe?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What do you do when your family doesn’t care about you?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why did the Greek city state never form an empire?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.